In my research for this paper, I re-read a book by Francis Chan called "Erasing Hell". The book was written mostly in response to Rob Bell's "Love Wins". In the book, Chan makes frequent use of scripture to support his view that Hell is a place of everlasting, eternal punishment (though he does admit that scripture does hint heavily towards a doctrine of annihilationism). I found it very interesting that, in his chapter entitled "What Jesus Actually Said about Hell", he uses a lot of Old Testament apocryphal references.
(For those of you who aren't sure what that is, many Catholic and Anglican bibles have a few "extra" books tagged onto their Old Testaments. Most protestant churches reject these books because they are not a part of the official canon. The Book of Common prayer tells us that these documents are to be "read for example of life and instruction of manners; but yet it doth not apply them to establish any doctrine".)
![]() |
Have fun burning in Hell, losers! |
Anyhow, I found it interesting that he would use those verses, but outright reject what canonized scripture has to say about Christ's descent. In his FAQ, he says about 1 Peter 3, (quoted below) that "it almost certainly doesn't mean that Jesus was preaching the gospel to unbelievers who had died." and goes on to suggest that the passage may be referring to disobedient spirits from the time of Noah. His ultimate point is that Jesus went to hell to proclaim victory in light of the cross and to those imprisoned there, which seems a little juvenile.
Anyway, thats kind of neither here nor there and may or may not end up actually being a part of my paper. Here is a rough draft of what I've written about what scripture has to say about it:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiTVCwFmJlteVtD3Mf_e2Opec8FBBgs0QInmWZWWJpd7tOsfPprTo_qa1I4uk3LEXmXu6SsdsCjAf1S41DeH0JLxTWeSLShFDtMpJfYsoD7sXQfWhZaQAhjUcbSm7WmMz9s4GDJQog8y-aK/s320/geneva-bible.jpg)
Christ’s descent into Hell is also mentioned in more detail in much of the early Christian apocryphal literature. While some of these ‘gospels’ were condemned by the church and rejected as gnostic teaching, some of the books that did not contradict church doctrine were kept in church tradition, even though they did not make the New Testament.
One such work, the “Epistle to the Apostles”, commonly dated to the 2nd century, tells us that not only did Christ preach in Hades, but he also baptized the righteous:
For to that end I went down unto the place of Lazarus, and preached unto the righteous and the prophets, that they might come out of the rest which is below and come up into that which is above; and I poured out upon them with my right hand the water of life and forgiveness and salvation from all evil.
Another text, which heavily influenced church doctrine on this subject, was “The Gospel of Nicodemus”, containing material that dates to apostolic times, around the third century. Here, Jesus is shown bringing Adam and all the saints out of hell with him.
And the Lord, stretching forth his hand, said: “Come unto me, all ye my saints which bear my image and likeness... And forthwith all the saints were gathered in one under the hand of the Lord... And the Lord stretched forth his hand and made the sign of the cross over Adam and over all his saints, and he took the right hand of Adam and went up out of hell, and all the saints followed him... and he brought them all into the glory and beauty of paradise.”
While Apocryphal literature does not hold the same level of doctrinal authority as the Scriptures of the Old and New Testament, sacred Scripture, did in fact, grow out of early church tradition with the support of the Patristic Fathers. It is therefore reasonable to take a look at what they have they have to say about this matter.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Which, we will get to... later!
Comments